And when they do, if there are any flaws they’re going to pick up on it. People are going to be looking hard at your presentation. When you are working with still imagery there are no distractive elements such as the model doing a song and dance routine. There is an important consideration that is applicable to most MMD applications, but arguably more so when you’re using it with Ray-MMD.

Since it is summer and I have a weakness for Japanese anime girls in traditional costumes ( if you haven’t figured that out already), I’m going with this one: Tda MEIKO Yukata (edit by Murabito124) An important consideration about presenting your models TDA style models, generally are made from many separate parts so in general do not have these issues as individual materials can be easily isolated.Īlso as a general rule, MMD models that uses texture maps to define their materials works best. If you are new to MMD but want to use Ray-MMD, stick with the TDA style models until you have a better understanding on how the system works and its limitations.Īlso, many models may need some editing work done on them to make them accept material specifications properly. However, the TDA style models, of which there are probably hundreds of variants, generally do work well. Many models, especially the older ones like the default models do not look nice when you try to render them with Ray-MMD.

Choosing the right models to use with Ray-MMD I will be using some terminology and concepts introduced in the last part but this article can otherwise be read on it own. But if you did not, no matter as this part will deal specifically with the application of fill lights in a Ray-MMD environment. Welcome back if you’ve read Part 1 of this series.

Mmd raycast